The Indifference of Churches to Members Amidst Economic Hardship in Nigeria

In recent years, Nigeria has faced a series of economic challenges that have left many citizens struggling to meet their basic needs. As the cost of living continues to rise, families are finding it increasingly difficult to afford even two standard meals a day, let alone three. 

This dire situation has prompted many to question the role of religious institutions, particularly Churches, in providing support and assistance to their congregations.

Despite the overwhelming evidence of hardship, churches across the country seem to remain indifferent to the plight of their members, as financial assessments and demands for contributions continue to escalate. 

One of the most pressing concerns among Church members is the unyielding financial assessments and many other commitments imposed on branches by their headquarters. These assessments have not only remained unchanged but have also increased year after year, even during times of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

The lockdowns in 2020 forced many families into precarious situations, yet Churches continued to demand the same financial contributions from their congregants. This raises a critical question: How can churches expect their members to meet these financial obligations when so many are struggling to put food on the table and owing debt including? The removal of fuel subsidies has further exacerbated the economic situation in Nigeria, leading to rise steeply prices for goods and services.

Many families are now unable to afford basic necessities, and yet Churches persist in their calls for financial contributions. The disconnect between the realities faced by congregants and the demands placed upon them is alarming and speaks to a broader issue of indifference within religious institutions. 

In times of hardship, one would hope that Churches would prioritize the welfare of their members over structural projects and financial assessments. However, many Churches seem to be doubling down on their efforts to fund ambitious projects rather than addressing the immediate needs of their congregations. The push for donations aimed at financing new buildings or renovations continues unabated, despite the clear signs that many members are struggling to survive. This attitude is increasingly pushing members far away from the community but the church seems unconcerned.

It is essential to recognize that while some individuals may find ways to thrive in current challenging circumstances, they represent a small fraction of the population. For the majority, the reality is plain: Hunger is a daily struggle, and many are unable to afford necessary medical treatment. 

The failure of Churches to acknowledge this suffering and respond with compassion is both disheartening and troubling. To truly grasp the extent of the hardship faced by Church members, one must engage with them on a personal level. Those who are close to individuals within these communities often bear witness to the pain and suffering that many endure.

Stories abound of families who have lost loved ones due to hunger or preventable illnesses because they could not afford medical care. Such tragedies should serve as a wake-up call for Church leaders who continue to preach about financial contributions without addressing the pressing needs of their congregants. 

In these trying times, Churches that genuinely care about their members’ welfare would have noticed an influx of individuals – far above the ordinary, seeking assistance for food and educational expenses behind the closed door. Many congregants feel abandoned and overlooked as they navigate their daily struggles. This sense of neglect is compounded by the persistent report of Church leaders emphasizing financial contributions rather than community support. 

Churches have historically played a vital role in providing support during times of crisis, offering not only spiritual guidance but also practical assistance. However, the current climate suggests a shift away from this traditional role. The emphasis on financial assessments and project funding has overshadowed the need for compassion and community engagement. It is crucial for Churches to realign their priorities and focus on the well-being of their members. 

Other Recommendations: 

1. Churches should halt financing large projects that were not initiated and financed before the onset of economic hardship. 

2. Redirect Fundraising Efforts: The same vigor and intensity used to raise funds for structural projects should now be redirected towards supporting the most vulnerable members of the congregation. This includes raising funds specifically for food and medical expenses, ensuring that those in need receive assistance promptly. 

3. This Christmas, local Churches should aim to raise sufficient funds to provide food supplies for all members, not just those identified as "poor." By avoiding labels that may induce shame, Churches can foster a sense of community and solidarity among members. The comfortable ones may choose not to accept or share their provisions, reinforcing the idea of unity within the body of Christ. 

4. Bishops should consider drastically reducing the financial assessments required to be remitted to headquarters by 2025, Church branches that could not complete their 2024 assessment should be overlooked. This action would demonstrate genuine care and support for congregants, allowing them to feel valued and understood by their leaders. 

5. While it remains important for churches to pursue structural advancements, they should also create avenues for fundraising that address scholarships, grants, medical bills, and other forms of support concurrently. This dual approach will help meet both spiritual and practical needs within the community. 

6. Church administrations should take advantage of modern tools by conducting regular surveys among members to measure their thought and opinion, needs and interests. Understanding the perspectives and challenges faced by congregants will guide Church leadership in making informed decisions that truly serve the community. 

In conclusion, Churches have a unique opportunity to embody the teachings of Christ by prioritizing the well-being of their members during these challenging times. Churches should prioritize competition for compassion over construction. By focusing on compassion, inclusivity, and practical support, they can strengthen their communities and foster a spirit of togetherness that reflects the true essence of faith which many Churches preach. In doing so, they will not only help alleviate the burdens faced by many but also strengthen their own foundations as places of hope and healing in this trying times.